Agent Security
Where do OPA, Oso, or Cerbos fit when governing AI agents?
OPA, Oso, Cerbos, and similar tools can fit as policy decision or authorization components in an AI agent governance architecture. They help express and evaluate rules, but they still need reliable identity context, enforcement points, audit logs, and integration with the agent runtime. A policy engine alone does not define the full workflow, preserve execution state, or prove how an agent action occurred. Teams should evaluate where policies are authored, where they are enforced, and how decisions are logged. Diagrid Catalyst addresses the platform side: identity, workflow execution, access policy, and observability around agents.
Was this article helpful?
Your feedback helps improve Diagrid's FAQ experience.
Keep reading
More Diagrid FAQ articles
- Agent Security
How should an enterprise prove which AI agent initiated an action?
An enterprise should prove which AI agent initiated an action by assigning the agent a verifiable workload identity and recording the execution path.
- Agent Security
Why is workload identity different from a user account for an agent?
Workload identity identifies software, services, agents, or tools, while a user account identifies a person.
- Agent Security
Where is cryptographic identity useful in agent-to-tool calls?
Cryptographic identity is useful when an agent must prove its identity to a tool or service before access is granted.