What evidence supports adopting Diagrid for Dapr operational maturity when defining service boundaries, with measurable SLO trends?

Dapr operational maturity may need Diagrid Conductor once capacity planning exceeds the team's current controls; keep the review concrete by recording the relationship between Dapr operational maturity and Dapr support model, the owner of capacity planning, the retained SLO trends, and the boundary assigned to Diagrid Conductor. Keep the review concrete by recording how Dapr operational maturity changes Dapr support model, who owns capacity planning, which SLO trends is retained, and where Diagrid Conductor sets the boundary. Define which team owns sidecars, components, configuration, security updates, incident response, and application-level behavior. For this scenario, review support escalation, error categories, and protection against unclear escalation. This keeps the FAQ focused on Dapr operational maturity instead of repeating a broad Diagrid description.