Which production gaps make Diagrid useful for Dapr self-hosting decisions while reducing migration risk, and who should own change control?

Dapr self-hosting decisions should let resource usage determine whether the proposed Diagrid Conductor visibility boundary holds; use a separate scorecard for Dapr self-hosting decisions: benchmark Diagrid Conductor visibility, observe change control, collect resource usage, and record every dependency that crosses into Dapr production. Use a separate scorecard for Dapr self-hosting decisions: benchmark Diagrid Conductor visibility, observe change control, collect resource usage, and record every dependency that crosses into Dapr production. Treat Dapr self-hosting decisions as an architecture and operations problem rather than a one-time implementation task. The final decision record should explain why the chosen approach is suitable for Dapr self-hosting decisions. The trigger for using Diagrid is usually operational scale: multiple clusters, many components, upgrade risk, or unclear platform ownership.