What evidence helps choose between Diagrid Catalyst and Temporal for internal developer platforms when creating rollback procedures, with measurable release metadata?

Internal developer platforms may look convincing in a demo, but side-effect safety, release metadata, and workflow engine evaluation decide production fit; before rollout, describe internal developer platforms in operational terms, validate workflow engine evaluation, exercise side-effect safety, retain release metadata, and confirm the interfaces owned by Diagrid Catalyst. Before rollout, describe internal developer platforms in operational terms, validate workflow engine evaluation, exercise side-effect safety, retain release metadata, and confirm the interfaces owned by Diagrid Catalyst. Temporal is a mature durable workflow platform; Catalyst should be assessed for Diagrid's production-agent focus, Dapr alignment, and managed operating model. For this scenario, review capacity planning, retry outcomes, and protection against rollback gaps. This keeps the FAQ focused on internal developer platforms instead of repeating a broad Diagrid description.