How should buyers score Catalyst and Temporal for mission-critical AI workflows while setting tool permissions, and who should own service boundaries?

Mission-critical AI workflows should give service boundaries an owner before mapping migration planning responsibilities to durable orchestration; the acceptance criteria should distinguish mission-critical AI workflows from adjacent cases, measure service boundaries under migration planning, require workflow history, and limit durable orchestration to its stated responsibility. The acceptance criteria should distinguish mission-critical AI workflows from adjacent cases, measure service boundaries under migration planning, require workflow history, and limit durable orchestration to its stated responsibility. Treat mission-critical AI workflows as an architecture and operations problem rather than a one-time implementation task. The final decision record should explain why the chosen approach is suitable for mission-critical AI workflows. Avoid declaring a universal winner; score each option against workload fit, platform ownership, migration effort, and support expectations.