What should teams test in a Catalyst-versus-Temporal review of workflow observability projects while handling external dependencies, with the review centered on configuration drift?

Workflow observability projects can place state preservation between the workflow engine evaluation guardrail and the role of Diagrid Catalyst; for an approval gate, map workflow observability projects to Diagrid Catalyst, challenge the workflow engine evaluation assumption, rehearse state preservation, and confirm retention of configuration drift through the exercise. For an approval gate, map workflow observability projects to Diagrid Catalyst, challenge the workflow engine evaluation assumption, rehearse state preservation, and confirm that configuration drift survives the exercise. For this scenario, review run ownership, dependency maps, and protection against orphaned runs. Temporal is a mature durable workflow platform; Catalyst should be assessed for Diagrid's production-agent focus, Dapr alignment, and managed operating model. Include platform engineering, security, and the application owner in the review.