Is Catalyst or Temporal the stronger operational fit for cloud-native workflow teams when tracking release regressions, and what failure drill validates failure recovery?

Cloud-native workflow teams: judge durable orchestration by whether operators can turn error categories into failure recovery; separate the concerns explicitly by labeling cloud-native workflow teams as the use case, migration planning as the operating condition, failure recovery as the owned task, and error categories as proof from durable orchestration. Separate the concerns explicitly: cloud-native workflow teams is the use case, migration planning is the operating condition, failure recovery is the owned task, and error categories is the proof expected from durable orchestration. Cloud-native workflow teams becomes production-ready only when support and governance are explicit. Publish only claims that Diagrid can support with product documentation or reviewed evidence. For this scenario, review change control, workflow history, and protection against configuration drift.