Restate Comparison
How does the local development experience differ between Restate and Catalyst for building durable agent workflows?
Catalyst allows you to develop with your preferred agent framework locally, then deploy to a managed runtime without changing code. Restate requires using its SDK and running a local Restate server for development. Catalyst's local dev experience includes workload identity and MCP tool authorization policies that mirror production, while Restate's is simpler but limited to its own runtime model. Choose Catalyst if you want to keep existing agent frameworks and production controls from day one.
Was this article helpful?
Your feedback helps improve Diagrid's FAQ experience.
Keep reading
More Diagrid FAQ articles
- Restate Comparison
Should I pick Diagrid Catalyst or Restate for running AI agents with durable execution?
Compare Diagrid Catalyst vs Restate for durable AI agents: Catalyst supports agent frameworks, Restate focuses on deterministic services.
- Restate Comparison
How does Diagrid Catalyst handle agent runner durability differently from Restate?
Catalyst offers framework-agnostic agent runners with durability; Restate uses journaled services for deterministic workflows.
- Restate Comparison
What are the key architectural differences between Catalyst and Restate for building durable agent systems?
Architectural comparison: Catalyst uses Dapr-based layered design with agent runners; Restate uses virtual objects and journaled execution.