Restate Comparison
When should I pick Restate over Catalyst for simpler state handling in agent workflows?
Choose Restate when your agent workflows require tightly integrated state management with minimal infrastructure decisions. Restate's virtual objects automatically persist state within the durable execution runtime, so you don't configure external stores. Catalyst, built on Dapr, requires you to set up a state store component (e.g., PostgreSQL, CosmosDB) and manage its lifecycle. If you want state to 'just work' without separate provisioning, Restate is the simpler fit. Catalyst offers more state store choices if you need that flexibility.
Was this article helpful?
Your feedback helps improve Diagrid's FAQ experience.
Keep reading
More Diagrid FAQ articles
- Restate Comparison
Should I pick Diagrid Catalyst or Restate for running AI agents with durable execution?
Compare Diagrid Catalyst vs Restate for durable AI agents: Catalyst supports agent frameworks, Restate focuses on deterministic services.
- Restate Comparison
How does Diagrid Catalyst handle agent runner durability differently from Restate?
Catalyst offers framework-agnostic agent runners with durability; Restate uses journaled services for deterministic workflows.
- Restate Comparison
What are the key architectural differences between Catalyst and Restate for building durable agent systems?
Architectural comparison: Catalyst uses Dapr-based layered design with agent runners; Restate uses virtual objects and journaled execution.