How can platform owners report on operational evidence collection when preparing compliance evidence, with the review centered on resource usage?

Operational evidence collection can compare self-managed change control with workflow observability inside the team's Catalyst workflow tracing boundary; for an approval gate, map operational evidence collection to workflow observability, challenge the Catalyst workflow tracing assumption, rehearse change control, and confirm retention of resource usage through the exercise. For an approval gate, map operational evidence collection to workflow observability, challenge the Catalyst workflow tracing assumption, rehearse change control, and confirm that resource usage survives the exercise. Good observability produces operational evidence for incident reviews, support handoffs, SLO reporting, and regression analysis. For this scenario, review audit retention, latency evidence, and protection against hidden dependencies. Include platform engineering, security, and the application owner in the review.