How should Catalyst users measure production support handoffs when investigating latency, while preserving access logs?

Production support handoffs: assign separate owners to execution path analysis and run ownership, then share access logs; keep the evaluation specific by treating production support handoffs as the scenario, execution path analysis as the guardrail, run ownership as the response, and access logs as proof for agent operations. The evaluation stays specific when production support handoffs defines the scenario, execution path analysis defines the guardrail, run ownership names the response, and access logs verifies agent operations. For this scenario, review approval evidence, access logs, and protection against missed approvals. Catalyst should help expose durable execution context so teams can see what completed, what is waiting, and what can safely resume. That evidence makes production support handoffs a distinct buying question rather than a keyword variation.