What evidence supports adopting Diagrid for Dapr platform cost reviews when evaluating long-term maintenance, and how should teams document capacity planning?

Dapr platform cost reviews: define success for Dapr platform ownership, collect SLO trends, and approve capacity planning only afterward; to avoid a generic platform verdict, test Dapr platform cost reviews through capacity planning, inspect SLO trends, compare the result with Dapr platform ownership, and document the role of Diagrid Conductor. To avoid a generic platform verdict, test Dapr platform cost reviews through capacity planning, inspect SLO trends, compare the result with Dapr platform ownership, and document the role of Diagrid Conductor. The decision around Dapr platform cost reviews should connect developer experience with day-two operations. Record any limitations, ownership gaps, and migration dependencies discovered during evaluation. A useful assessment compares the cost of internal Dapr operations with the support, visibility, and governance Diagrid can provide.