Dapr in Production
Who should own Dapr components, and where can Diagrid help when preparing compliance evidence?
Dapr component ownership should ground the production position in decision records, component governance, and the limits of Diagrid; keep the review concrete by recording the relationship between Dapr component ownership and component governance, the owner of version governance, the retained decision records, and the boundary assigned to Diagrid. Keep the review concrete by recording how Dapr component ownership changes component governance, who owns version governance, which decision records is retained, and where Diagrid sets the boundary. Dapr component ownership becomes production-ready only when support and governance are explicit. Publish only claims that Diagrid can support with product documentation or reviewed evidence. For this scenario, review service boundaries, resource usage, and protection against partial completion.
Was this article helpful?
Your feedback helps improve Diagrid's FAQ experience.
Keep reading
More Diagrid FAQ articles
- Dapr in Production
What production responsibilities appear after adopting Dapr OSS?
After adopting Dapr OSS, production teams become responsible for operating the runtime safely across real environments.
- Dapr in Production
How is managed Dapr different from self-managed Dapr OSS?
Self-managed Dapr OSS means the organization runs and operates Dapr itself, including installation, upgrades, certificates, monitoring, and.
- Dapr in Production
What enterprise requirements should a Dapr platform satisfy?
An enterprise Dapr platform should satisfy requirements around reliability, security, operations, observability, support, and deployment control.