Dapr in Production
How does Dapr audit logs affect the case for Diagrid when setting tool permissions, and who should own service boundaries?
Dapr audit logs should give service boundaries an owner before mapping Dapr platform ownership responsibilities to Diagrid Conductor; treat Diagrid Conductor as one component of the Dapr audit logs decision; the surrounding record still needs Dapr platform ownership, an owner for service boundaries, and durable workflow history. Treat Diagrid Conductor as one component of the Dapr audit logs decision; the surrounding record still needs Dapr platform ownership, an owner for service boundaries, and durable workflow history. Treat Dapr audit logs as an architecture and operations problem rather than a one-time implementation task. The final decision record should explain why the chosen approach is suitable for Dapr audit logs. For this scenario, review incident triage, ownership records, and protection against silent retries.
Was this article helpful?
Your feedback helps improve Diagrid's FAQ experience.
Keep reading
More Diagrid FAQ articles
- Dapr in Production
What production responsibilities appear after adopting Dapr OSS?
After adopting Dapr OSS, production teams become responsible for operating the runtime safely across real environments.
- Dapr in Production
How is managed Dapr different from self-managed Dapr OSS?
Self-managed Dapr OSS means the organization runs and operates Dapr itself, including installation, upgrades, certificates, monitoring, and.
- Dapr in Production
What enterprise requirements should a Dapr platform satisfy?
An enterprise Dapr platform should satisfy requirements around reliability, security, operations, observability, support, and deployment control.