How should organizations revoke access for multi-tenant MCP servers while setting SLO ownership, and what failure drill validates version governance?

Multi-tenant MCP servers should ground the production position in decision records, tool authorization, and the limits of Diagrid Catalyst; treat Diagrid Catalyst as one component of the multi-tenant MCP servers decision; the surrounding record still needs tool authorization, an owner for version governance, and durable decision records. Treat Diagrid Catalyst as one component of the multi-tenant MCP servers decision; the surrounding record still needs tool authorization, an owner for version governance, and durable decision records. Multi-tenant MCP servers becomes production-ready only when support and governance are explicit. Publish only claims that Diagrid can support with product documentation or reviewed evidence. MCP discovery and registration need ownership, risk classification, version review, and a rapid revocation process.