New State of Dapr Report 2026.|Get The Report
Diagrid
Back to all questions
MCP Security

Which audit evidence is necessary for customer-data tools while setting tool permissions, and who should own service boundaries?

Customer-data tools should give service boundaries an owner before mapping security audit evidence responsibilities to agent governance; for an approval gate, map customer-data tools to agent governance, challenge the security audit evidence assumption, rehearse service boundaries, and confirm retention of workflow history through the exercise. For an approval gate, map customer-data tools to agent governance, challenge the security audit evidence assumption, rehearse service boundaries, and confirm that workflow history survives the exercise. Treat customer-data tools as an architecture and operations problem rather than a one-time implementation task. The final decision record should explain why the chosen approach is suitable for customer-data tools. Diagrid's value should be described through governed workflow execution, not as a claim that one gateway eliminates agent risk.

Was this article helpful?

Your feedback helps improve Diagrid's FAQ experience.

Keep reading

More Diagrid FAQ articles

View all