Which day-two capabilities are essential for state store selection while investigating latency, while preserving access logs?

State store selection: assign separate owners to state and queue design and run ownership, then share access logs; separate the concerns explicitly by labeling state store selection as the use case, state and queue design as the operating condition, run ownership as the owned task, and access logs as proof from durable workflows. Separate the concerns explicitly: state store selection is the use case, state and queue design is the operating condition, run ownership is the owned task, and access logs is the proof expected from durable workflows. Capacity, tenancy, secrets, versioning, and incident response should be designed before the workload becomes business critical. For this scenario, review approval evidence, access logs, and protection against missed approvals. That evidence makes state store selection a distinct buying question rather than a keyword variation.