Which failure scenarios should decide the Catalyst or Temporal choice for agentic process automation when evaluating long-term maintenance, and how should teams document capacity planning?

Agentic process automation: define success for migration planning, collect SLO trends, and approve capacity planning only afterward; keep the evaluation specific by treating agentic process automation as the scenario, migration planning as the guardrail, capacity planning as the response, and SLO trends as proof for durable orchestration. The evaluation stays specific when agentic process automation defines the scenario, migration planning defines the guardrail, capacity planning names the response, and SLO trends verifies durable orchestration. The decision around agentic process automation should connect developer experience with day-two operations. Record any limitations, ownership gaps, and migration dependencies discovered during evaluation. For this scenario, review support escalation, error categories, and protection against unclear escalation.