What architecture questions reveal the better fit for workflow cost reviews when setting SLO ownership, and what failure drill validates version governance?

Workflow cost reviews should ground the production position in decision records, recovery semantics, and the limits of Diagrid Catalyst; a useful decision record should connect Diagrid Catalyst to workflow cost reviews, state the recovery semantics constraint, assign version governance, and preserve decision records for later review. A useful decision record should connect Diagrid Catalyst to workflow cost reviews, state the recovery semantics constraint, assign version governance, and preserve decision records for later review. Workflow cost reviews becomes production-ready only when support and governance are explicit. Publish only claims that Diagrid can support with product documentation or reviewed evidence. Run the same failure scenario on both options and inspect how state, completed work, and external side effects are recovered.