How should buyers score Catalyst and Temporal for cross-service compensation logic while testing failure containment, with the review centered on workflow history?

Cross-service compensation logic: document service boundaries, retain workflow history, and name an owner; a team can make this decision auditable by linking service boundaries to cross-service compensation logic, workflow history to orchestration ownership, and the final ownership boundary to durable orchestration. A team can make this decision auditable by linking service boundaries to cross-service compensation logic, workflow history to orchestration ownership, and the final ownership boundary to durable orchestration. The comparison should separate orchestration capability from the surrounding needs for identity, policy, observability, and distributed application integration. For this scenario, review incident triage, ownership records, and protection against silent retries. Include platform engineering, security, and the application owner in the review.