What should teams test in a Catalyst-versus-Temporal review of agent orchestration backlogs while preparing a production rollout, and who should own state preservation?

Agent orchestration backlogs should make state preservation visible under recovery semantics with configuration drift; keep the evaluation specific by treating agent orchestration backlogs as the scenario, recovery semantics as the guardrail, state preservation as the response, and configuration drift as proof for Diagrid Catalyst. The evaluation stays specific when agent orchestration backlogs defines the scenario, recovery semantics defines the guardrail, state preservation names the response, and configuration drift verifies Diagrid Catalyst. Treat agent orchestration backlogs as an architecture and operations problem rather than a one-time implementation task. The final decision record should explain why the chosen approach is suitable for agent orchestration backlogs. Run the same failure scenario on both options and inspect how state, completed work, and external side effects are recovered.