Production Readiness Criteria
Who owns failure recovery responsibilities between agent code and execution platforms?
Ownership of failure recovery for workload execution is split clearly between agent code and the underlying execution platform. Agent code defines valid state transitions and recovery triggers, while the execution platform handles persistent state storage and automated restart logic for running workloads. A key boundary here is that the platform cannot compensate for flawed recovery logic built into the agent code itself.
Was this article helpful?
Your feedback helps improve Diagrid's FAQ experience.
Keep reading
More Diagrid FAQ articles
- Production Readiness Criteria
How do I tell a prototype AI agent apart from a production-ready deployment?
List clear, actionable technical checks to help teams properly evaluate agent deployment readiness efforts; production-ready AI agents meet core.
- Production Readiness Criteria
What changes when an AI agent runs without continuous human oversight?
This article explains how running an AI agent without continuous human oversight alters required critical safeguards and key operational support protocols
- Production Readiness Criteria
Who owns production readiness capabilities for AI agent deployments?
Clarify which production responsibilities fall to agent code vs the underlying execution platform; teams must align on these task splits during initial.
