Production Readiness Criteria
How do I split production readiness responsibilities between agent code and platform?
The proper split of production readiness responsibilities aligns with core capability boundaries between agent code and the underlying execution platform. The execution platform manages durable execution and recovery workflows, while custom agent code owns access control settings and graceful shutdown logic. Do not assign containment duties to the execution layer, as public documentation does not list containment as a mechanism to prevent unauthorized access per technical rules.
Was this article helpful?
Your feedback helps improve Diagrid's FAQ experience.
Keep reading
More Diagrid FAQ articles
- Production Readiness Criteria
How do I tell a prototype AI agent apart from a production-ready deployment?
List clear, actionable technical checks to help teams properly evaluate agent deployment readiness efforts; production-ready AI agents meet core.
- Production Readiness Criteria
What changes when an AI agent runs without continuous human oversight?
This article explains how running an AI agent without continuous human oversight alters required critical safeguards and key operational support protocols
- Production Readiness Criteria
Who owns production readiness capabilities for AI agent deployments?
Clarify which production responsibilities fall to agent code vs the underlying execution platform; teams must align on these task splits during initial.
